4

Somewhere in a Richmond law office in the summer of 1971, a corporate attorney with a sensible haircut and an unsensible amount of free time sat down and wrote eight pages that would quietly outlive him, outlive his subsequent Supreme Court seat, and — best I can tell from where we’re currently standing — outlive the version of American democracy he claimed to be rescuing. He titled it “Attack on American Free Enterprise System,” which is the kind of title that tells you immediately the author has never been attacked by anything more dangerous than a strongly worded op-ed. You start reading about student protests and Ralph Nader and something called “the free enterprise system,” and you finish reading with the uncomfortable sensation of having found the receipt for your own government, itemized and everything. Somewhere between page three and page six, this mid-century lawyer sketches out, in the driest bureaucratic prose imaginable, the plan that would eventually deliver you Citizens United, the Federalist Society, and a policy document literally called Project 2025. Nobody elected him to do any of it. Nobody voted on the Powell Memo. It was just quietly handed to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce like a To-Do list from God, if God worked in mergers and acquisitions.

This is the founding document of a fifty-year performance, and like all great performances, it has a stage, a cast, a script, and — this part never changes — a box office that only pays out to people who were already rich when the curtain went up.

What the Powell Memo Actually Said (Spoiler: It Wasn’t Subtle)

On August 23, 1971, Lewis F. Powell Jr. — a well-regarded corporate lawyer who would be nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court a mere two months later, a timeline coincidence that should bother you more than it apparently bothered the Senate Judiciary Committee — sent a confidential memorandum to Eugene Sydnor Jr. of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Its title, “Attack on American Free Enterprise System,” reads less like a policy paper and more like the opening crawl of a movie where the aliens have already landed.

Powell’s argument, stripped of its lawyerly hedging, went something like this: capitalism is under siege, and the besiegers are not the people you’d expect. Not Soviet agents. Not bomb-throwers. The enemy, Powell insisted, came from “perfectly respectable elements of society” — professors, journalists, clergy, television producers, and worst of all, college students who kept reading Ralph Nader and getting ideas. Business leaders, meanwhile, had responded to this so-called siege with what Powell dismissively called “appeasement, ineptitude and ignoring the problem.” A funny accusation to level at an industry that, by most measures, owned the appeasers.

So Powell offered a plan. And it is worth sitting with how comprehensive this plan actually was, because “comprehensive” undersells it the way “a little damp” undersells the Titanic:

Fund friendly professors and pressure university boards to correct the ideological “imbalance” on campus; bankroll a media apparatus of books, pamphlets, and televised commentary to compete for the American mind; treat the courts not as a neutral arbiter but as “the most important instrument for social, economic and political change,” worth colonizing with sympathetic litigation and friendly judges; organize business into a unified, disciplined political lobby that behaves less like a trade association and more like an insurgency; and mobilize shareholders as a standing political army, ready to be deployed whenever free enterprise felt itself, once again, under siege.

Read that list again. It’s not a memo. It’s a franchise pitch. And business bought in at a scale that would make a timeshare salesman weep with envy.

The Institutions Powell’s Memo Built, One Ribbon-Cutting at a Time

Here is where my particular brand of skepticism really begins to kick in, because if you told me in 1971 that a confidential eight-page memo to a trade association would, within a decade, spawn an entire parallel civilization of think tanks, legal societies, and lobbying shops, I would have assumed you were pitching a screenplay. And yet.

The Heritage Foundation launched in 1973, seeded partly by beer money from Joseph Coors, who later told a historian his political activism had been “stirred” directly by Powell’s memo. The American Legislative Exchange Council was born the same year, a group whose entire purpose is to hand state legislators pre-written bills so they don’t have to trouble themselves with the tedious business of legislating. The Business Roundtable formed in 1972, the Cato Institute in 1977, and the Federalist Society in 1982 — the last of these founded explicitly to do what Powell had prescribed a decade earlier: colonize the judiciary from law school onward, one clerkship, one Federalist Society chapter dinner, one confirmation hearing at a time.

None of this happened by accident, and none of it happened via the democratic process you were taught about in ninth grade civics. It happened via funding. Olin money, Scaife money, Koch money, Coors money — a donor class quietly building an entire alternate infrastructure of “ideas” the way a contractor builds a strip mall: efficiently, on schedule, and without asking the neighborhood’s opinion. It is hard to escape the feeling that democracy, in this telling, was less a system of self-governance and more a lawn that certain people, finding grass insufficiently profitable, quietly paved over in gold.

(Or so they tell themselves. The official story is always “ideas competing in the marketplace.” The actual story is a marketplace that one side simply bought.)

The Courtroom Was Always the Real Target

If there’s a single throughline connecting a 1971 corporate memo to your 2026 news feed, it runs through the judiciary — because Powell, a future justice himself, understood something the rest of us are only now fully absorbing: legislatures are noisy, elections are unpredictable, but nine unelected people in robes can rewrite the rules of American life in a single afternoon and stay employed for life while doing it. Why lobby Congress for forty years when you can install one favorable judge for forty?

Powell got his own turn at bat. In 1978, Justice Powell authored the majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, ruling that corporations enjoy First Amendment rights to spend money influencing ballot initiatives — a legal seed that sat quietly in the soil for three decades before blooming, in 2010, into Citizens United v. FEC, the 5–4 decision that told corporations, unions, and every dark-money nonprofit with a patriotic-sounding name that they could now spend essentially unlimited sums influencing American elections, so long as they didn’t hand the money directly to a candidate like uncouth animals. The author drafted the opening act. The sequel just had better financing and a friendlier bench, thanks in no small part to the very legal pipeline — the Federalist Society — his memo had inspired into existence.

This is the part where a normal op-ed pauses to say “and that changed everything,” as though the change were an accident of jurisprudence rather than the plan working exactly as scheduled. It wasn’t an accident. It was a fifty-year construction project, and the ribbon-cutting just happened to look, on the news, like a single Tuesday in January.

Project 2025: The Sequel Nobody Asked For, Except the People Who’d Been Asking For It Since 1971

Every good franchise eventually gets a reboot, and the Powell Memo got its most explicit one yet in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a sprawling governance blueprint that even its own architects have described as walking directly in Powell’s footsteps — a plan to “deconstruct the administrative state,” gut regulatory agencies, and consolidate executive power in ways Powell, watching from whatever legal-brief afterlife awaits Supreme Court justices, would presumably recognize as his own handwriting, just typed up by grandchildren with better graphic design software.

Consider the audacity here for a second, because it deserves its own paragraph: an organization founded specifically to operationalize a secret 1971 corporate memo has spent the subsequent half-century so successfully embedding itself in the machinery of government that it now publishes, openly, a document proposing to finish the job. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a mission statement with a fifty-year head start and receipts.

And here’s the reality-tunnel question worth sitting with: maybe the Powell Memo was never really about “free enterprise” at all. Maybe free enterprise was just the costume. Underneath it, the whole apparatus reduces to a much simpler proposition, one Powell himself never quite said out loud but every subsequent institution acted on with total clarity — that democratic accountability is an inconvenience, and inconveniences, if you have enough money and enough decades, can eventually be engineered around.

Who Profits From the Show

Strip away the talk of liberty, free markets, and constitutional first principles, and the Powell Memo reduces to a far duller, far more legible motive: a specific class of very wealthy people did not want to keep sharing power, tax revenue, or regulatory oversight with anyone else, and they built, with extraordinary patience, an entire cultural and legal infrastructure to make sure they never had to. Lobbying expenditures have rocketed from roughly $400 million a year in the 1970s to over $5 billion annually now. Registered lobbyists outnumber members of Congress by something like twenty to one. Amicus briefs favoring business interests have multiplied more than tenfold since Powell put ink to paper. None of that is theater in the metaphorical sense. It’s theater in the literal, box-office sense — a decades-long production with sets (the think tanks), a script (the memo), a house band (friendly media), and a very specific target audience of one: the American voter, watching from the cheap seats, footing the bill for a show they were never cast in.

Somewhere in here, I should probably acknowledge my own complicity, because that’s the rule — you don’t get to point at the machine without admitting you’re also standing inside it, benefiting from cheap consumer goods and a stock-fed retirement account that this exact apparatus helped inflate. Fine. Acknowledged. The confused primate typing this sentence also has retirement investments managed by a financial planning agency. We are all, in our own small and compromised ways, ticket-holders in this theater, cheering or booing from seats that were arranged for us decades before we were born.

The Curtain Never Actually Closes

What makes the Powell Memo genuinely unsettling, fifty-five years on, isn’t that one lawyer had an idea. Lawyers have ideas constantly; most of them evaporate into a filing cabinet somewhere. What’s unsettling is how faithfully — how almost bureaucratically — the idea got executed. Think tank, check. Legal society, check. Media apparatus, check. Judiciary capture, check. A political movement that spent five decades building institutions nobody voted for so that, eventually, elections would matter less. Project 2025 isn’t a rupture from that plan. It’s the plan’s retirement party, thrown by the institutions Powell’s memo funded, for the ideology Powell’s memo articulated, catered by the donor class Powell’s memo mobilized.

And maybe that’s the actual joke buried under fifty years of think-tank white papers and judicial confirmation hearings: the “attack on free enterprise” Powell warned about in 1971 was never real, or was at best wildly overstated by a man annoyed that Ralph Nader was getting good press. But the counter-attack he proposed in response? That one landed. That one is still landing, on a Tuesday morning in Washington, right about now, in a courtroom or a statehouse or a think-tank conference room you’ll never be invited to. The show, as they say, must go on. You’re just not on the guest list — you’re the one who bought the tickets.

---

Further Reading:

• The Powell Memorandum (1971) Full Text – Washington and Lee University Law Scholarly Commons – Access and download the original full-text PDF document and archival record of Lewis F. Powell Jr.’s confidential 1971 memorandum from Washington and Lee University School of Law.
• First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978) – Oyez Project – A comprehensive legal summary and case audio of Justice Powell’s landmark Supreme Court majority opinion establishing First Amendment protection for corporate campaign expenditures.
• History and Founding of the Federalist Society – EBSCO Research Starters – An accessible, unblocked academic overview tracing the origins, institutional structure, and influence of the conservative legal movement founded in 1982.
• Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project – Wikipedia Overview – A thoroughly documented neutral reference hub detailing the policy origins, executive agency blueprints, and organizational history of the Heritage Foundation’s governance plan.
• Citizens United v. FEC (2010) Primary Documents & Case Overview – Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute – Access primary legal documentation, statutory references, and constitutional commentary on the legal mechanics of campaign finance, corporate speech, and independent political expenditures.